Latest Blog

ILS vs. IPS: Decoding the Evolution of Product Sustainment

In the intricate world of ensuring that complex systems remain operational and effective throughout their lifecycle, two key philosophies have emerged: Integrated Logistic Support (ILS) and Integrated Product Support (IPS). While both share the overarching goal of maximizing system availability and minimizing total ownership costs, they represent distinct yet related approaches. Understanding their nuances, advantages, and limitations is crucial for any organization dealing with sophisticated products, from aerospace giants to burgeoning tech startups. Let's dive into a detailed comparison.

Integrated Logistic Support (ILS): The Foundational Framework

ILS, at its core, is a disciplined methodology focused on the logistics aspects necessary to support a system. It emphasizes the identification and development of all logistical support elements required throughout a system's lifecycle, starting early in the design phase. Think of it as building the essential scaffolding around a product to keep it running.

Key Elements of ILS:

• Maintenance Planning and Management: Defining how the system will be maintained, including schedules, levels of repair, and resources.
• Supply Support: Ensuring the availability of spare parts, consumables, and repair parts.
• Technical Data: Providing the necessary documentation for operation, maintenance, and training.
• Personnel Training and Training Devices Equipping personnel with the skills to operate and maintain the system effectively.
• Support and Test Equipment: Supplying the tools and equipment required for maintenance and diagnostics.
• Packaging, Handling, Storage, and Transportation (PHS&T): Planning for the safe and efficient movement and storage of the system and its components.

Advantages of ILS:

• Early Consideration of Support ILS prompts organizations to think about supportability early in the design phase, leading to more supportable systems.
• Structured Approach: It provides a well-defined framework for identifying and addressing logistical needs.
• Focus on Logistics Efficiency: ILS aims to optimize the logistical aspects of support, such as spare parts management and maintenance procedures.
• Cost Reduction (Logistics Focused): By planning logistics effectively, ILS can lead to significant cost savings in areas like inventory management and

Disadvantages of ILS:

• Potentially Narrow Focus: ILS traditionally emphasizes the logistical aspects and might not fully integrate with other product lifecycle phases like design and engineering.
• Can be Reactive: While aiming for proactivity, ILS can sometimes be more focused on addressing logistical needs as they arise rather than deeply influencing the product's inherent supportability.
• Limited Design Influence: The logistics perspective might not always have a strong voice in the initial design decisions, potentially leading to less supportable products.

Integrated Product Support (IPS): A Holistic and Evolutionary Approach

IPS represents a more evolved and comprehensive philosophy that builds upon the foundations of ILS. It takes a broader, product-centric view, integrating supportability considerations into all phases of the product lifecycle, with a strong emphasis on the interplay between the product itself and its support system.

Key Elements of IPS (as defined by the Defense Acquisition University - DAU):

• Product Support Management: Overall strategy and management of product support.
• Design Interface: Ensuring supportability is a key driver in product design.
• Sustaining Engineering: Ongoing engineering support throughout the lifecycle.
• Supply Support: Managing the flow of spares and repair parts.
• Maintenance Planning and Management: Defining maintenance concepts and requirements.
• Packaging, Handling, Storage, and Transportation (PHS&T): Addressing logistical aspects.
• Technical Data: Providing necessary documentation.
• Training and Training Support: Educating personnel.
• Computer Resources Support: Managing hardware and software needs.
• Facilities and Infrastructure: Ensuring necessary support facilities.
• Manpower and Personnel: Identifying and managing human resources for support.
• System Safety: Integrating safety considerations.

Advantages of IPS:

• Holistic Integration: IPS fosters a collaborative environment where design, engineering, and support teams work together from the outset.
• Strong Design Influence: Supportability becomes a fundamental design parameter, leading to products that are inherently easier and cheaper to support.
• Proactive Approach: IPS emphasizes anticipating and mitigating support challenges throughout the entire lifecycle.
• Comprehensive Cost Optimization: By influencing design and integrating all support elements, IPS can lead to significant reductions in total ownership cost.
• Enhanced System Effectiveness: Products designed with supportability in mind tend to have higher availability and reliability.

Disadvantages of IPS:

• Increased Complexity: Implementing IPS can be more complex due to the need for tight integration across different functional areas.
• Potential for Initial Higher Costs: The upfront investment in integrating support considerations into design might be higher.
• Cultural Shift Required: Successful IPS implementation often requires a significant shift in organizational culture and collaboration.

Key Differences Summarized:

Feature	Integrated Logistic Support (ILS)	Integrated Product Support (IPS)
Focus	Primarily on the logistics of supporting a system.	Broadly on the product and all aspects of its support throughout lifecycle.
Integration	Can be somewhat siloed from design and engineering.	Highly integrated with design, engineering, and all support elements.
Timing of Influence	Primarily during and after the design phase.	From the earliest conceptualization and design stages.
Proactiveness	Aims to be proactive in logistics planning.	Inherently proactive in influencing design for supportability.
Scope	Primarily logistical elements.	Encompasses logistical, technical, engineering, and management aspects.
Goal	Efficient logistics and reduced logistics costs.	Optimized total ownership cost and enhanced system effectiveness.

Export to Sheets

Potential Risks of Combining ILS and IPS:

While IPS is often seen as an evolution of ILS, simply "combining" them without careful consideration can lead to potential risks:

The key to successfully leveraging the strengths of both lies in understanding that IPS incorporates the principles of effective logistics management (the core of ILS) within a broader, more integrated framework. It's not about simply adding more layers but about evolving the approach to product sustainment.

Conclusion: The Path Towards Holistic Product Sustainment

ILS laid the groundwork for structured thinking about product support. It highlighted the critical importance of logistics in ensuring system availability. IPS builds upon this foundation by recognizing that true supportability is not just about efficient logistics; it's deeply intertwined with the product's design, engineering, and overall lifecycle management.

The trend in modern industries is clearly towards the principles of IPS. By fostering collaboration, integrating support considerations early, and taking a holistic view of the product lifecycle, organizations can achieve significant benefits in terms of reduced costs, increased system effectiveness, and enhanced customer satisfaction.

However, the transition from ILS-centric thinking to a fully integrated IPS approach requires careful planning, a commitment to collaboration, and a clear understanding of the potential pitfalls of simply trying to combine the two without a cohesive strategy. The future of product sustainment lies in embracing the integrated, proactive, and product-centric philosophy of IPS, learning from the valuable lessons and foundational principles established by ILS. For organizations aiming for long-term success and optimal performance of their complex systems, understanding and strategically implementing the principles of IPS is no longer a luxury – it's a necessity.

Why Do We Need Integrated Logistic Support in Industries?

Think about a massive power generation plant, humming away and supplying electricity to a bustling city like Karachi. The initial investment to build such a plant – the cost of the land, the towering structures, the turbines, the complex control systems – is astronomical. Let's say it costs a cool $1 billion. That's a huge chunk of capital, right?

Now, consider the lifespan of this power plant, which could easily be 30 to 50 years. Over this time, it won't just run on its own. It will need constant attention: regular maintenance on those giant turbines, replacement of worn-out parts, upgrades to keep up with technological advancements, specialized lubricants, skilled engineers and technicians working around the clock, security personnel, and even the eventual decommissioning and safe disposal of the plant at the end of its life.

The cumulative cost of all these activities throughout the plant's operational life – the lifecycle cost – can easily dwarf the initial $1 billion investment. Some studies suggest that for complex industrial assets, the lifecycle cost can be anywhere from two to five times, or even more, than the initial purchase price! So, that $1 billion plant could end up costing $2 billion to $5 billion or more over its entire existence. Suddenly, that initial price tag doesn't seem so daunting in comparison as the initial cost is 17% to 33% of the total cost.

This is precisely why Integrated Logistic Support (ILS) is not just a nice-to-have but a fundamental necessity in industries dealing with such high-value, long-lifespan assets. ILS provides a structured and proactive approach to managing all these support elements from the very beginning, right when the plant is being designed.

Imagine if the engineers designing our power plant only focused on making it generate electricity efficiently, without considering how it would be maintained. They might choose components that are cheap initially but are prone to frequent failures and require specialized, expensive replacements. They might not design easy access points for maintenance, making even routine checks time-consuming and costly. They might not think about the training needed for the staff who will operate and maintain the plant.

Without this integrated thinking, the lifecycle cost of the plant could balloon uncontrollably. Unexpected breakdowns would lead to prolonged outages, costing the power company (and ultimately the consumers in Karachi) significant revenue. Inefficient maintenance practices would drive up labor costs. A lack of readily available spare parts would further extend downtime.  

ILS tackles this head-on by embedding supportability considerations into the design process itself. It asks questions like:  

• Reliability and Maintainability: Can we design the plant with components that are less likely to fail and easier to repair or replace? This might mean investing slightly more upfront in higher-quality components but saving significantly on maintenance costs down the line. For example, choosing modular designs allows for quicker replacement of faulty units rather than lengthy repairs on-site.  
• Spare Parts and Supply Chain: How can we ensure that necessary spare parts are readily available and cost-effectively sourced throughout the plant's life? ILS involves forecasting potential needs, establishing efficient supply chains, and potentially even negotiating long-term contracts with suppliers. Imagine the cost savings of having a predictable and reliable source for critical turbine blades compared to scrambling for a replacement during an emergency shutdown.  
• Training and Personnel: What skills will the personnel need to operate and maintain this plant effectively, and how will they be trained? ILS plans for comprehensive training programs, ensuring that the workforce is competent and can perform their tasks efficiently and safely, reducing errors and potential damage. Think about the specialized training required for operating the complex control systems; well-trained staff are less likely to make mistakes that could lead to costly accidents or downtime.  
• Support Equipment and Tools: What specialized tools and equipment will be needed for maintenance and repairs, and how will these be managed? ILS identifies these needs early on, ensuring they are available when required and properly maintained. Imagine trying to repair a massive turbine without the correct specialized lifting equipment – it would be dangerous and time-consuming.  
• Technical Documentation: What manuals, diagrams, and procedures will be needed for operation and maintenance? ILS ensures that comprehensive and up-to-date documentation is readily available, enabling efficient troubleshooting and repairs. Imagine trying to diagnose a complex system fault with outdated or incomplete manuals – it would be like trying to solve a puzzle with missing pieces.  

Why does this optimization of lifecycle cost matter so much?

Optimizing lifecycle cost has a direct impact on the financial viability and sustainability of industrial operations. For our power plant example:  

• Increased Profitability: By reducing maintenance costs, minimizing downtime, and ensuring efficient operation, the power company can generate more electricity at a lower overall cost, leading to higher profits.
• Competitive Pricing: Lower operating costs can translate to more competitive electricity prices for consumers in Karachi, benefiting the entire community.
• Long-Term Sustainability: Efficient resource management and reduced waste contribute to a more sustainable operation over the plant's long lifespan.
• Investor Confidence: A well-managed plant with predictable and optimized costs is more attractive to investors, ensuring future growth and development.

In essence, ILS provides the framework to shift the focus from just the initial price tag to the total cost of ownership. By proactively planning for supportability, industries can make smarter investment decisions, reduce long-term expenses, and ensure the reliable and efficient operation of their critical assets, ultimately contributing to a healthier bottom line and a more sustainable future. It's about looking beyond the present and strategically managing the entire journey of an industrial asset.